Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Mark Levin’

Hunting, fishing, battle, sin, and politics all have one thing in common, they all use traps. Traps in all shapes, sizes, and forms have the same basic design criteria. In order for them to work, they must appear to be something other than what they are. A hook alone will never catch a fish, it must be baited with something tantalizing. Zhuge Liang of the Three Kingdoms period in Ancient China developed the 36 Strategies of battle, several of which describe traps designed to lure an opponent into a weak or untenable position. The sin of adultery almost always begins with what appears to be an innocent friendship.

The political systems of Statism, which include Communism, Fascism, and Socialism, has its own traps as well. A free population never willingly subjects itself to such a system directly. Humanity longs for freedom. Not merely freedom from something, be it oppression or religious persecution, but freedom of each to chart his own course. For good or ill, gain or loss, happiness or misery, the freedom to choose our own destiny lies deep within every person’s core.

The tyranny of Statism must eliminate that freedom if it is to survive. Survival is the eventual goal of every organization, government included. If Statism must remove freedom to survive, and humanity’s core desire is freedom, then Statism can only be imposed by direct force, or through a trap. While there have been many who would have liked to have forcefully induced the United States into a tyrannical regime, our previous freedoms made that a practical impossibility. To see the goal through, a trap needed to be set. That trap, is Liberalism.

Thousands of pages have been written on this topic, among the best of them are Mark Levin’s Liberty and Tyranny, and Jonah Goldberg’s expansive tome Liberal Fascism. However, neither focused on the “baits” used by the Statist to lure us willingly into bondage. As the hook must be concealed with a juicy worm, so must tyranny’s hooks be concealed.

Once such lure is The Crisis. The structure of this lure is quite simple: Begin with usually an imaginary, insignificant, or easily manageable problem X; through propaganda, inflate the severity of X until the population clamors for a solution…any solution; offer exactly one solution, which is merely government control, but with the caveat that higher revenue is required; finally, use straw man arguments to destroy any challenging solutions. Once you understand this lure, you’ll realize just how many times it has been employed.

Equality, or it’s mirror Fairness, is another bait. As children, we clamor for fairness. Equality is seen as a right, whether deserved or not. If our parents did a good job, we were taught that life is seldom fair. This is a truism etched deep into humanity’s most ancient history. According to Scripture, Cain slew Abel because his sacrifice was not seen as the equivalent of his brother’s and it was not fair. The Statist plays upon our childish desire to see fairness and equality imposed upon the world – whether deserved or not.

“It is not fair that AIG executives receive fat bonuses while you barely scratch out a living,” was one recent cry of the Statist. Details will always be sketchy at best whenever this tactic is employed. What is actually not right is for any person, group, or government to set the maximum income of another person. I have every right to earn as much income as I desire. My income is a product of my physical or intellectual labor and therefore my property. To set a maximum level for that labor denies me access to my property and therefore steals what is rightfully mine. As long as I do not earn income through illicit means, or do so through denying another’s rights, the government has no business interfering with my personal gain.

Protecting The Victim is yet another lure, and a personal favorite of Ann Coulter. This bait places the needs, and often the desires, of a small, hapless sub section, above the rights of the whole population. It is not to be confused with protecting a real victim, which is our duty as human beings. Protecting a real victim usually only requires assistance in monetary form or perhaps time. Both of these can be, and are, freely donated. At most, the needs of the helpless can be placed above the desires of the collective, which is still often good and just.

Forcing one’s need or desire above another’s right, however, is no longer just. The news has been replete with examples of this bait’s utilization. One example would be holding up or negating foreclosure proceedings. While it seems good on the surface to allow a person or family to stay in their home, it cannot be stated clearly enough that it is not their house. The house is the property of the bank until such time as all the contractual obligations of the borrower are fulfilled. The bank and the borrower had the right to enter in to that agreement. Both parties are obligated to deliver their end of the bargain. Denying one party the right to act when the other fails to honor the agreement places a desire above a right. Justice is no longer blind, or just.

These are just three lures in the large tackle box employed in the trap of Liberalism used by the Statist, but these are the most commonly used. In recognizing the bait, the existence of the trap becomes clear. By denying the Statist the power of the trap, he will be unable to once again bring tyranny, and its chains to a population. Freedom must be the overriding metric used in determining the worth of a particular course of action. Freedoms, once lost, are rarely recovered, and therefore should be a most prized possession. And those who do not care about their freedoms, are most likely already in the trap.

Read Full Post »

Dear Ms. McCain,

For the last couple of weeks I have been on the sidelines, listening to you. It is a shame that you decided to pick a fight with two of the most outspoken women in the Conservative Movement. While this has added publicity for you, it has not been good for either the movement, or Republicans in general. What is also a shame was Laura Ingram’s “plus sized ” comment. She should have been more professional. However, politics has never been a clean sport. Even early presidential races were filled with invective and personal slurs, some, would make modern politicians blush. If you intend to play in this sandbox, I recommend you grow a thick skin.

It is not my intent to patronize you, or vent hostility. Quite the contrary, I would like to help you understand a world to which you are obviously new. You, and those like you, might one day be leaders in the Republican party, and I do appreciate your willingness to be a voice for us. However, unless you understand and support Conservatism, most Republicans will reject you out of hand. So far, you have not been a voice for Conservatism, but instead a voice for those who would distort and neglect our principles in an attempt to win elections or “get along” with the other side.

Meghan, this is first and foremost, an ideological battle. The ideals and principles of those on the Left and Right are absolutely incompatible. At one time, they might have been, but that ship sailed well over 80 years ago. I will not try to convince you which one is the correct ideology, that is a decision every American must make for themselves. I will merely frame our ideals, and leave the rest to you.

American Conservatism’s First Principle, if there ever was one, is Liberty for the citizens of this wonderful country. The freedom to make the most of one’s God given talents and abilities. The freedom to be left alone if desired. The freedom to make the best choices for one’s self and family. Everything else hangs on this First Principle. But it is not enough to define this principle, you must realize from where Liberty springs. It comes directly from our Creator. If there is not a God above government, then there is no true Liberty, freedom can be taken away with the stroke of a pen.

Our Constitution was written in a way that acknowledges this fact. It then defines that our freedoms belong to all of us by virtue of our Creation. It further defines the powers of government are only what has been granted to it by the governed, and its chief purpose is to defend the freedoms of the individual, and defend them equally. That said, the first question of any law is therefore “does this make all individuals more free, or less free.” The default position should always be – more free. Everything Conservatives fight for can be broken down into the answers to that question.

‘Fairness’, or achieving equal outcomes, is not an authorized function of our government. The people never gave it that power. However, our government has taken it, by subterfuge in most cases and by force in some. In the over two centuries since our country’s founding, government has grown, chipping away little by little at our freedoms to allow it enough space to expand. And all for the proposed purpose of achieving ‘fairness’. We are all taught from a young age that life is not fair. Believing that fairness can be legislated is simply a fantasy of the politically immature. At no time the long history of our species has this ever been accomplished, though countless regimes have tried. It cannot be done.

The only fairness which can be achieved is through equality of opportunity, and equality of justice. Our country has made countless mistakes on these two points, but slow and sure progress has come. Our economic system is based upon balancing these two ideals. Not everyone will become wealthy. It is either through lack of drive, or lack of talent, that economic fortunes are separated. There are those who became wealthy by cheating their fellow man. It is up to the justice system to punish those responsible. No one should achieve a higher status in this country by trampling upon the rights of others. And if justice never comes in this life, the final judge is God. But there are those who believe that if a person became wealthy, they must have done it by trampling upon the rights of others. This is a mistaken assumption and cannot be tolerated in a free society.

There are those who, for whatever reason, lack the ability to earn a living for themselves. Conservatives believe it is the duty of their community to care for them. If their community cannot, then the larger entity of the city, then county, and so on. The assistance should not come from the federal government except as a last resort. A distant government simply cannot know how to best help the individual who is in need. It is the proverbial cannon being used as a fly-swatter.

It is not the duty of government to educate our youth. It is only the duty of government to ensure that the states, and local education facilities, treat the individual equally. It is not the duty of government to ensure funding for artistic endeavors, that is what philanthropists do with their own money. It is not the duty of government to provide funding for scientific research, except with the possible exception of military use. That is the realm of private investment. It is not the duty of government to control banking, or Wall Street. Only to ensure equal treatment of the individual and protect their rights.

These are but a few examples. Our government has overstepped its intended role for so long, that we, as a people, have forgotten how true freedom tastes. The intention of the Founder’s was to make the Federal Government something that rarely, if ever, entered our daily lives. At this point in time, it is rarely that the Federal Government does not make its presence, and power known. This is our fight, this is our reason for blogging, or protesting, or voting. Conservatives such as Laura Ingram and Ann Coulter, have given their lives to this fight. They are two of our better front line soldiers. Others would include Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michelle Malkin, and Mark Levin. If you have ever met soldiers who have fought in a front line position, you know they do not have smooth edges. They are a bit rough and uncouth because of their arduous fight. We should appreciate their rough edges, and thank them – because in the end, they fight for all our freedoms.

If you would like to be a leader in the Conservative Movement, study our history – especially of the Founders, study economics, and study the law. If you agree with and hold fast to our ideals, you will be accepted as a Conservative. If you stand strong and fight for the freedom of all Americans, we will gladly accept you as a leader.

Thank you.
A Red Dot in A Red State

Read Full Post »

I never had a chance to vote for Reagan. He was out of office by the time I was voting age. I did, however get to vote for his successor, George H. W. Bush. While I recognized that there were non-trivial differences between the two, in my naivete they were negligible. Fast forward to Bush’s ’92 defeat by Bill Clinton. Every Republican knew why Bush lost, outrage over his 1988 “Read my lips, no new taxes” promise that he broke pushed almost 19% of the his base to vote for Ross Perot. He did not break this pledge deliberately, he believed Democrats, who hung him out to dry. It was during that time that I almost became a Libertarian.

I did not like what I was seeing. Democrats were moving further to the left towards a different “-ism”, and Republicans were sounding like Democrats. The slide started much earlier than even Eisenhower’s “Dynamic Conservatism”. Going back to Herbert Hoover’s administration we find he had a distaste for laissez-faire thinking. He increased regulations, tarrifs, and even proposed the Department of Education and advocated for a senior pension program which became Social Security.

In fact, you have to go back to Calvin Coolidge to find a true Conservative. Not perfect, sure, but far closer to anything we have seen in the White House in 80 years…with the notable exception of Ronald Reagan. As much maligned by Democrats as G. W. Bush was, he was closer to their heroes than people will admit. I sit and wonder, with a smile on my face, what our current Democratic party would say about Coolidge.

Well, I don’t have to wonder. All I need to do is listen to what they say about Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin and amplify the volume by an order of magnitude. These two men are undoubtedly the leaders of the Conservative Movement within the Republican Party. It absolutely makes my blood boil to see Rush mistakenly identified as the leader of the Republican Party – usually by some MSM talking head who does not know history, nor understand the difference, or care. Many of us wish he would head the Republican Party, but the truth is he and Levin do far more good as spokespeople for the movement. I hope the RNC Chairman Mr. Steele understands that, but I doubt it. He appears to be as weak as our previous party leaders, and almost all of our representatives in Congress.

Conservatives imagine a completely different America than what exists now. What we were as a country and people has been gone for so long that there is almost no one alive who can remember it. An America where the populace and businesses are not neutered by their Federal Government. An America where the entire government sticks to the job of protecting the rights of the governed, and obeys the restrictions set down for it in our Constitution. An America without massive red tape, capital reducing regulations, and burdensome taxation. An America with a truly free population of citizens, equal in opportunity, and in responsibility.

The majority of Republicans believed in this imaginary country long ago, but our party was hijacked by those who only sought to increase power for themselves. Every American paid the price for electing these men and women. We paid the price in our freedom and our children’s freedom. Each generation that has passed since 1929 has seen freedom taken from it. Slowly, in most cases, rapidly in a few. That freedom will never come back unless the Conservative Movement rises again to prominence. We need a true Conservative to lead the Republican Party. Someone with the same dream. Someone with the guts to tear apart the massive government bureaucracy that stifles us all. Hopefully, if Americans once again get a taste of real freedom, they will be far less likely to give it away as easily.

For those who still believe that George W. Bush was a conservative, learn history.

Read Full Post »